Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 85344 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2003 14:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 85333 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2003 14:48:28 -0000 Received: from smtp02.myhosting.com (168.144.68.182) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2003 14:48:28 -0000 Received: from Lagrange ([80.252.165.122]) by smtp02.myhosting.com (Merak 5.5.7) with SMTP id KIC74160 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:48:35 -0400 From: "Leo Sutic" To: "'Avalon Developers List'" Subject: RE: avalon-framework **Util.java Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:52:53 +0200 Message-ID: <002101c30295$87bda040$0801a8c0@Lagrange> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: <200304150039.46528.peter@realityforge.org> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > have logkit/log4j depend on that. What is the attitude among log4j:ers to depend on AF? I think this should be resolved first. /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org