Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 88207 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2003 10:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 88191 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2003 10:43:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (217.158.110.65) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 10:43:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 18726 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2003 10:43:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (stefano@80.105.91.155) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 10:43:23 -0000 Message-ID: <3E71B253.1060100@apache.org> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:43:31 +0100 From: Stefano Mazzocchi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: Spice License References: <002701c2e8bb$e7641720$0801a8c0@Lagrange> <200303130809.37620.peter@realityforge.org> In-Reply-To: <200303130809.37620.peter@realityforge.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Leo Sutic wrote: >>And I don't think having Spice as a dependency is any good. Peter Donald wrote: > Any reason why? There is no problem in having a dependency on Spice. It's just natural that people move code in when the same developer have commit access and both have a compatible license. The opposite is a sign there is something wrong that must be resolved in a better way that simply routing around the issue by moving the code outside. Stefano. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org