Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" <dev@avalon.apache.org>
Message-ID: <3E676A2F.10808@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 10:33:03 -0500
From: Berin Loritsch <bloritsch@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Avalon Developers List <dev@avalon.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Excalibur]  Is there anything preventing release of the RC2
 packages?
References: <3E675C8E.5090109@apache.org> <3E6766D0.50703@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <3E6766D0.50703@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Stephen McConnell wrote:
> 
> I'm totally unhappy about he documentation status on Instrument.  It 
> simply too little. Link to manager and client contain absolutely nothing 
> which is well and truly below acceptable release status.  Also, the 
> JavaDoc link is pointing to the entire-avalon-world javadoc instead of 
> the local javadoc resources in the distribution.

What would you like to see with the content?  Its a matter of focusing
energy on the weak points in as efficient a manner as possible.  I would
really appreciate any help from anyone else who is familiar with
Instrument to write up some docs to satisfy the release issues.  I would
really like to get this done ASAP so we can focus on fun stuff--but this
is necessary.

> I havn't looked at logger, pool or testcase but I should get to those 
> later this evening.

Kool.  All I really did since the last release candidate was ensure that
the documentation associated with them really reflected the package that
they were a part of.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org