Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 72257 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2003 17:30:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 72244 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2003 17:30:42 -0000 Received: from smtp03.wlv.untd.com (209.247.163.66) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2003 17:30:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 997 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2003 17:30:44 -0000 Received: from dialup-64.157.51.145.dial1.washington1.level3.net (HELO apache.org) (64.157.51.145) by smtp03.wlv.untd.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2003 17:30:44 -0000 Message-ID: <3E4E7942.10701@apache.org> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:30:42 -0500 From: Berin Loritsch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: [Fortress] Dispose bug References: <20030215150333.54660.qmail@web14307.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030215150333.54660.qmail@web14307.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N J Aaron Farr wrote: > --- J Aaron Farr wrote: > >>Apparently the attatchment didn't work right. Here's the patch file (I >>hope). >>:) >> >>jaaron >> > > > My email client is acting buggy. > > One last try, this time cut and paste: > > FortressServiceManager > ----[snip]----------------------------------------------------------------- > > 134c134 > < m_used.put( component, handler ); > --- > >> m_used.put( component.toString(), handler ); > > 165c165,167 > < final ComponentHandler handler = (ComponentHandler)m_used.remove( > component ); > --- > >> final ComponentHandler handler = (ComponentHandler)m_used.remove( > > component.toString() ); > > ----[snip]----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Again, this change properly handles disposable components for me. Can anyone > else confirm the use of disposable in Fortress? It's the same logic used in ECM.... Hmmm. I believe the problem may have to do with the fact that the component is proxied.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org