Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 43632 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2003 00:50:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 43621 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 00:50:23 -0000 Received: from nat1.sp.collab.net (HELO localhost.localdomain) (208.185.179.196) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2003 00:50:23 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h1K0pLp07418 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:51:21 -0800 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:51:21 -0800 Message-Id: <200302200051.h1K0pLp07418@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Pan/0.9.7 (Unix) From: "Greg Stein" To: "Avalon Developers List" Subject: Re: maven-style repository for avalon stuff? References: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N In article , "Leo Simons" wrote: >... > so would it make sense to have http://avalon.apache.org/repository > contain the avalon jars & dists? It is probably easy as hell for the > maven peeps to do a > > ssh daedalus.apache.org > cd /www/avalon.apache.org/repository > scp -r * wherever_it_goes_on_ibiblio > > on request, so that ibiblio can remain the primary point of > distribution. Please note that the Board wants to see ASF-operated hardware as the only, definitive point of distribution. Other sites are free to *re*distribute, but the primary point should be from an ASF box. (today, that means icarus, daedalus, or nagoya; I believe the Maven folk have some boxen at rackspace.com; when that gets a foo.apache.org name, and the infrastructure people assume some level of admin capability over it, then that can be another distro point) > All this just temporarily until the infrastructure peeps > and the peeps looking at a common repository hammer out something more > solid. Maybe this statement is that you see ibibilio as temporary? Not sure how to read it, but non-ASF-box distribution should be considered a bug to fix asap, rather than a temporary solution. The ASF shouldn't participate or condone actions or policies which (potentially) violate software licenses. Thx, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org