Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 96964 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2003 15:13:07 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2003 15:13:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 2703 invoked by uid 97); 12 Jan 2003 15:14:23 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 2656 invoked by uid 97); 12 Jan 2003 15:14:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 2636 invoked by uid 98); 12 Jan 2003 15:14:22 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: "Avalon Developers List" Subject: RE: Synchronizing James and Cornerstone Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:12:56 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-reply-to: <200301121758.07772.peter@realityforge.org> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > And we did move the file repository code into our project. But we do still > > have references to org.apache.avalon.cornerstone.services.store.Store. Did > > you want us to take the entire store service out of Cornerstone? > that would be great as the code sucks. Is there anything else we should take over, in your view? > > Well, isn't Phoenix was an implementation of Avalon, > > not the definition of it? > Cornerstone is defined as "Set of default services for Avalon/Phoenix" > Every container has perculiarities but phoenix specific ones are meant to go > into cornerstone. So any application that uses Cornerstone is, by that definition, not intended to be portable? If Stephen wants Cornerstone users to work with Fortress/Merlin, then he needs to do what, in your view, to obtain such portability? --- Noel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: