avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <mcconn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [A4:Proposal][fortress] refactoring
Date Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:15:33 GMT


Berin Loritsch wrote:

> Peter Royal wrote:
>
>> On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 04:16  PM, Berin Loritsch wrote:
>>
>>> Ok.  I made Event independent of the Excalibur ThreadPool
>>> implementations.  Apparently Doug Lea's concurrent package has
>>> well tested thread pooling/executor framework.
>>>
>>> Fortress has one less dependency now.  (well, two if you count
>>> Thread-Context).
>>
>>
>>
>> ack! you mean you just removed the ability of having the event 
>> package sharing a common thread pool. (a phoenix app with a 
>> cornerstone thread pool block feeding several other blocks that host 
>> fortress containers or other blocks that have their own async queue's 
>> back by event).
>>
>> I have no problem using Doug's library, but I would like to retain 
>> compatibility with our thread pools.
>> -pete
>
>
> There is a major bug with the Excalibur Thread package that only
> affects some systems.  I am not sure what the final reason is, but all
> the mutex/threadpool complexity created an infinite loop/deadlock
> when the thread pool was destroyed. 


I can confirrm this.
Have seen infinite loop/deadlock situations - but never been able to get 
to the cause.

Steve.

-- 

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:mcconnell@apache.org
http://www.osm.net




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message