avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicola...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PMC:VOTE] PMC Voting Process
Date Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:47:04 GMT

Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
>> We can go through it again if you want. I'm kinda fed up with all 
>> "procedure" already though. Time- and effort-consuming, this "formalism".
> Don't get fed up - what we working oon is really importat stuff - it 
> will outlive Avalon, Avlon 5 and UberContainer. You are one of the 
> founding fathers and little children in a 2048 will look up a digital 
> plaque comemorating the your words of wisdom attributed to someone 
> called LS.

Stephen, rules are there to be used *by* us, not to maket *them* use us.

There is _no_ safety in numbers.

Laws are effective not because they are precise, but because there is 
police and a law system. In Apache we have a diffeent system, based on 
peer review and pressure, and chain-of-command with PMC-chair-board.

The ultimate decider is the board, whatever we decide first. And the 
board does what is best for Apache, not what the rules say. Quality 
standards say in esence that one should and do what is written, and 
write what one does. If the rule is ok, one uses it. If there are 
problems, one does something, writes what has been done, and moves on.

In Italy we have *very* precise laws. So long in fact that everyone can 
appeal to interpretations of it. Imagine if nobody believed in laws...

Let's try to follow the rules, but if they are not followed, let's think 
if it's the case to change *them* to follow us.

There is _no_ safety in numbers.

Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - There is _no_ safety in numbers -
             - There is _no_ safety in numbers -

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message