Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 57397 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2002 20:58:44 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 2002 20:58:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 28783 invoked by uid 97); 26 Dec 2002 21:00:01 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28746 invoked by uid 97); 26 Dec 2002 21:00:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28734 invoked by uid 98); 26 Dec 2002 20:59:59 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <3E0B6D3B.3030701@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 20:57:31 +0000 From: Paul Hammant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: Cornerstone / AltRMI References: <20021220124503.46834.qmail@web80302.mail.yahoo.com> <200212210753.17510.peter@realityforge.org> In-Reply-To: <200212210753.17510.peter@realityforge.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Folks, >On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:45, Paul Hammant wrote: > > >>The transport package in the cornerstone project makes Phoenix components >>of the server side of AltRMI. Given transport is likely to remain alpha >>like Altrmi for a while more, would it be simplest to move the classes to >>the altrmi project? >> >> The class in transport on cornerstone depend on other cornerstone services (cocket manager, connection manager). Should I still move transport to excalibur/altrmi ? The bulk of altrmi is not dependant on any part of cornerstone. Should I move all of AltRMI to avalon-sandbox ? If I do, I should drop the excalibur package prefix on AltRMI. Should the packaging become org.apace.avalon.altrmi from org.apache.excalibur.altrmi, or go to org.apache.altrmi? This last suggestion based on the fact that jakarta.apache.org and xml.apache.org projects are not encumbered by their full domain names. This package rename can be entertained because AltRMI is at < 1.0 release. It's now or never on package renames. Or is it the case that we are not ready to consider top level projects (budding or ortherwise) for avalon.apache.org ? Regards, - Paul -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: