Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 98467 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 13:56:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 13:56:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 27192 invoked by uid 97); 7 Dec 2002 13:57:46 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27176 invoked by uid 97); 7 Dec 2002 13:57:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27164 invoked by uid 98); 7 Dec 2002 13:57:45 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <3DF1FE5D.3010706@apache.org> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 14:57:49 +0100 From: Stephen McConnell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: Charter.txt References: <3DED8B96.3070501@apache.org> <3DED9A25.2010600@apache.org> <3DEF9489.90108@apache.org> <3DEFD867.1040700@apache.org> <3DEFDB36.70809@apache.org> <3DEFDD59.5030405@apache.org> <3DEFE6BB.40506@apache.org> <3DF1B855.4080708@yahoo.com> <3DF1BBAA.9000006@apache.org> <1039260755.1326.3.camel@lsd.student.utwente.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Leo Simons wrote: >On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 10:13, Stephen McConnell wrote: > > >>>For the week please. People might change their vote if lobbied / >>>persuaded. >>> >>> >>This has already been churned over - the conclusion was the introduction >>of a extension period of one week if the initial vote does not meet >>quorum. Here is the extract of the details concerning vote duration that >>address this point. >> >> (f) Vote Duration >> >> Any vote conducted by the PMC may be closed within 7 days of its >> initiation providing that quorum has been met in accordance with >> Article 1 (b). A vote not meeting quorum during the initial 7 >> day period shall default to a 14 day duration. On expiration of >> a 14 day vote duration, if quorum has not been achieved, the >> vote shall be consider as a failed vote. >> >>The desire is to ensure we don't have long running votes, but ensure >>adequate time for participation. >> >> > >Steve, I don't think you get what Paul means. Paul's diff IIUC is: > >< Any vote conducted by the PMC may be closed within 7 days of its > > >> Any vote conducted by the PMC may be closed 7 days after its >> >> > >ie don't close votes _within_ a week but _after_ a week. > >sounds okay to me. > > Here is a version including the "after" keyword: (f) Vote Duration Any vote conducted by the PMC may be closed after 7 days following initiation providing that quorum has been met in accordance with Article 1 (b). A vote not meeting quorum during the initial 7 day period shall default to a 14 day duration. On expiration of a 14 day vote duration, if quorum has not been achieved, the vote shall be consider as a failed vote. I've already added this change to the CVS version. Cheers, Steve. >cheers, > >- Leo > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: >For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > -- Stephen J. McConnell OSM SARL digital products for a global economy mailto:mcconnell@osm.net http://www.osm.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: