Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 44961 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 08:19:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 08:19:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 20503 invoked by uid 97); 5 Dec 2002 08:20:23 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20487 invoked by uid 97); 5 Dec 2002 08:20:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20475 invoked by uid 98); 5 Dec 2002 08:20:21 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <3DEF0BAA.70409@apache.org> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 09:17:46 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Creation of an "avalon" CVS repository for new Avalon5 codebase (Re: How to move forward?) References: <3DEDCFAE.1040707@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3DEDCFAE.1040707@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: [...] > I propose we have a new "avalon" CVS repository where to develop the new > Avalon5 system. Things will be discussed and committed only when decided > upon, and still eventually changed when again decided upon. > > This will make us do a clear cut with previous development methods, and > clearly indicate that it's a new effort and that the old will be > nevertheless maintained. > > +1 for a new "avalon" CVS repository > > Alternatively it can be called avalon5, avalonV, aValon, avalon-5, > avalon-ng... the important thing is that it's there. Despite a feeling by some that a decision has been taken on this, current votes stand in a tie like this: o Creation of an "avalon" CVS repository for new Avalon5 codebase +1: nicolaken, mcconnell +0: cziegeler -0: proyal -1: leosimons, leif Anyone else wants to say his? -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: