Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 70567 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2002 23:41:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2002 23:41:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 19666 invoked by uid 97); 3 Dec 2002 23:41:54 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19641 invoked by uid 97); 3 Dec 2002 23:41:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19603 invoked by uid 98); 3 Dec 2002 23:41:52 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <3DED40BC.2030509@aquilonia.org> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 23:39:40 +0000 From: Mauro Talevi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: [Altrmi] a future ? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Noel J. Bergman wrote: >>DRMI (Distributed RMI) is thought to be better. >> >> > >Isn't Distributed Remote Method Invocation (RMI) a bit redundantly >redundant? :-) From what the AltRMI site says, AutoRMI is more like it. > > > I agree that DRMI is redundant - Distributed and Remote are effectively synonymns, or in any case Distributed includes Remote. I quite like DMI because it conveys the spirit of AltRMI - ie of accessing distributed objects, which can be local or remote in a manner which is transparent to the caller as far as the Java interface is concerned. Mauro -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: