Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 23317 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 16:53:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 16:53:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 18014 invoked by uid 97); 9 Dec 2002 16:54:12 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17946 invoked by uid 97); 9 Dec 2002 16:54:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17858 invoked by uid 98); 9 Dec 2002 16:54:10 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-Authentication-Warning: lsd.student.utwente.nl: lsimons set sender to leosimons@apache.org using -f Subject: Re: [Proposal] PMC Resolution Voting Process From: Leo Simons To: Avalon Developers List In-Reply-To: <3DF45EA0.1010200@apache.org> References: <000d01c29d34$1e440670$2100a8c0@acsdom1.citius.com> <3DF0E8C0.3060403@apache .org> <3DF254F6.40509@apache.org> <3DF26EE7.3080509@apache.org> <3DF32801.5030606@apache.org> <1039350945.1354.30.camel@lsd.student.utwente .nl> <3DF342C4.7050908@apache.org> <1039422063.1379.4.camel@lsd.student.utwente.nl> <3DF45EA0.1010200@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 09 Dec 2002 17:53:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1039452812.1383.16.camel@lsd.student.utwente.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 10:13, Stephen McConnell wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > >On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 14:01, Stephen McConnell wrote: > > > >>Leo Simons wrote: > >> > >>>"layman" version of the text below; I think this is for all practical > >>>purposes the same but it reads a little easier (the trick: use a > >>>1000-word vocabulary ;). If it is indeed the same for practical purposes > >>>(Steve?) then I'm happy with the proposal I think. > >>> > >>The text (for all practical purposes) is the same as the proposal. > >> > >> > > > >Gotcha! You've fallen into my simplicity trap :D > > > > I was waiting for this reply! > > Gotcha! You've fallen into my ratiuonalization trap was expecting that, too :D just playing devil's advocate and seeing if there's holes to poke in. Looks rather airtight to me. cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: