avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Leo Sutic" <leo.su...@inspireinfrastructure.com>
Subject RE: [Avalon4:PROPOSAL] Context Consensus (version 2)
Date Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:19:52 GMT


> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:mcconnell@apache.org] 
> >   In regards to future canonical key names, it is the intent
> >   that the values placed in the context are runtime values that 
> >   can only be provided by the container. The Context should 
> >   not be used to retrieve configuration values or services 
> >   that can be provided by peer components.
> >
> 
> I recognize your concern, but I think it is problamatic.
> 
> I have cases where I'm constructing components that end up in 
> context. Its does not happen very often

That was my intent with the new text - basically saying that
"this is what we recommend in general, but as always
there are times when you have to do something else."

Can you think of a better way of saying it, if you agree
with the sentence above?

/LS


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message