Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 87659 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2002 10:25:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2002 10:25:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 19210 invoked by uid 97); 25 Nov 2002 10:26:44 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19171 invoked by uid 97); 25 Nov 2002 10:26:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19159 invoked by uid 98); 25 Nov 2002 10:26:42 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-Authentication-Warning: lsd.student.utwente.nl: lsimons set sender to leosimons@apache.org using -f Subject: Re: The Rules of Open-Source Programming From: Leo Simons To: Avalon Developers List In-Reply-To: <3DE16A86.8070705@apache.org> References: <3DE11019.5070906@apache.org> <3DE16A86.8070705@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 25 Nov 2002 11:25:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1038219924.1329.40.camel@lsd.student.utwente.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 01:10, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > more than these statistical details, I would like to know if somebody > ever implemented something in Phoneix that Peter didn't like yes > or voted -1 on. no (IIRC) > No, Sam, Phoenix *IS* one person's work. As Merlin is. that first statement is not true. I think it is unfair to the other people that contribute and work on phoenix to keep making statements like this. Please stop. The second started out as true and will shift toward not true if things go happily. If not it will probably become zero person's work. > History proved me dead wrong: Peter has not been able to create one > single healthy and diverse community around his code. This is an > indisputable fact and would not be bad by itself (a committer isn't > required to be a consensus builder) but it *is* bad for somebody that > pretends to be a leader. Peter has never pretended to be a leader (disagree? just find me an example or two :). Two more objections: I object to "single healthy and diverse community" not existing (but keep saying it for long enough and it will come true (I think paraphrasing yourself ;)), I also object to "his code" (again keep saying it long enough....) ta-dah: disputable facts :D > Yes, I'm saying this in the open because I would like other people to do > the same with me. another "Rule" from Sunir: The task for the leader of a team project is to work on the team, not the project. I'd say "primary task", but otherwise I'll happily say that with you. cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: