avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Royal <pro...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Fortress Backwards Compat
Date Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:55:47 GMT
On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 11:55  AM, Peter Donald wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 03:41, Peter Royal wrote:
>> On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 11:41  AM, Peter Donald wrote:
>>>> That works, but I'd like to be able to pass in an array of 
>>>> interfaces
>>>> to the ComponentFactory then to tell the ComponentProxyGenerator 
>>>> what
>>>> to proxy for.
>>>
>>> Where do I get this array of interefaces from?
>>
>> Good question :) How were you going to handle this?
>
> I wasn't ;)
>
> I was basically going to proxy every interface that could reasonably
> considered a potential Work interface. The main reason being that 
> Fortress
> does not know about exposed services as such - hence we add em all in 
> by
> default. Maybe too generous but in theory it should not break backwards
> compat (unless people cast to an implementation).

Gotcha. You still need an array of interfaces to proxy by the time you 
call the Proxy.newInstance method though.. that's what I was getting at 
:)
-pete
-- 
peter royal -> proyal@apache.org


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message