avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicola...@apache.org>
Subject Re: getting-started.xml
Date Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:57:29 GMT


Leo Simons wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 10:18, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
>>We also should decide where it goes, and some have hinted it could go 
>>side by side with the framework, although not being in the same package.
>>IMVHO it could be used as a simple reference implementation of the 
>>framework concepts and contracts.
>>
>>Continuing the past proposal about a new unified CVS, thinking out loud:
>>
>>   ./src/framework/**.java
>>   ./src/reference/**.java
>>   ./src/util/**.java
>>
>>   ./scratchpad/src/merlin2/**.java
>>   ./scratchpad/src/fortress/**.java
>>
>>Thoughts?
> 
> 
> I think you can view Tweety as a concept implementation, but not as a
> reference implementation. One thing it doesn't do for example is protect
> components from each other, or guarantee that the stuff a component can
> get from its SM has run up to initialize().
> There's a lot of stuff like that, and adding it all in would make the
> code complex to the level where it will be quite a bit more difficult to
> understand.

roger

In fact I was thinking of eventually adding other systems 
egg-tweety-birdy-pigeon-etc, but yes, it's a concept implementation.

Where would you position it then phisically? I have no clue.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message