avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Hammant <paul_hamm...@yahoo.com>
Subject RE: [PROPOSAL] a clazz act
Date Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:26:57 GMT

I am sure that 90% of us (me included) got in without the usual six-month of contributions.
at the number of people that actually commit versus _can_ commit.  Sometimes it has worked
in our
favour - Look at Nicola - he was only invited in to do xdocs++ work.  Now he has stepped up
to a
far more responsible role as PMC chair.  In fact its a _greatly_ unthanked role for Nicola.

I am going to stick by my guns and say "no".  Note, this is a vote, not a veto.  

- Paul

 --- Leo Sutic <leo.sutic@inspireinfrastructure.com> wrote: > > From: Paul Hammant
> > 
> > Stephen,
> > 
> > I think we should be rigid with the six months of patched 
> > contributions 
> > before granting commit/vote rights to Avalon.
> We haven't been rigid before (me & the guy writing the C# 
> version of framework, for example). I don't think this is
> reason enough.
> What I'd like to know is if this will lead to a dependency
> on clazz for framework? I would be -1 on any such dependency,
> especially while clazz is still very much growing in scope 
> and dependencies itself.

Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message