avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: jakarta-avalon-excalibur/container/src/java/org/apache/excalibur/container/lifecycle AbstractLifecycleExtensionManager.java LifecycleExtensionManager.java
Date Sun, 10 Nov 2002 05:03:01 GMT
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 15:44, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> I think that the AbstractLifecycleExtensionManager and
> LifecycleExtensionManager classes should stay with Fortress.  They are
> both part of the Fortress implementation of lifecycle extensions.  If
> you take a look at the Merlin implemetation approach is is quite
> different. Classes within the container/lifecycle package are intended
> to be only those interfaces and abstract implemetations that are
> required for extension interoperability.

They are a reasonable default implementation. Much like 
DefaultComponentManager is a reasonable default implementation of 
ComponentManager.

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you. 
        -- Ramsey Clark


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message