avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leo Simons <leosim...@apache.org>
Subject Re: getting-started.xml
Date Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:24:35 GMT
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 10:57, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > I think you can view Tweety as a concept implementation, but not as a
> > reference implementation. One thing it doesn't do for example is protect
> > components from each other, or guarantee that the stuff a component can
> > get from its SM has run up to initialize().
> > There's a lot of stuff like that, and adding it all in would make the
> > code complex to the level where it will be quite a bit more difficult to
> > understand.
> roger
> In fact I was thinking of eventually adding other systems 
> egg-tweety-birdy-pigeon-etc, but yes, it's a concept implementation.
> Where would you position it then phisically? I have no clue.

as in where in a potential unified CVS? In scratchpad atm, when it is
finished it (and other stuff, like 'pigeon'), could be put into
something like /src/tutorial/.


- Leo

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message