Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 9462 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 21:54:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 21:54:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 9203 invoked by uid 97); 1 Aug 2002 21:54:24 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9168 invoked by uid 97); 1 Aug 2002 21:54:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9122 invoked by uid 98); 1 Aug 2002 21:54:21 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <3D49ADF4.8080504@mitre.org> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:53:56 -0400 From: Michael Stanley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] .NET implementation of Avalon framework. References: <003701c239a3$d0024f60$ac00a8c0@Gabriel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Either way, its just another example of how MS embraces standards and interopability. They've done a lot of marketing to lure java developers back to MS technology. I would hate to see the #1 Java OSS community propagate this further. But I'm sure this is something that will need to be resolved by the ASF and the Jakarta Project. I would hope to see a new comunity spring up around C# development, sooner rather than later, but its not really my place to say as I'm just a long term lurker. Mike - Again I welcome these projects into the world, for the day when I'm *forced* to write C#, I will have a familiar framework and tools to work with. Berin Loritsch wrote: >>From: Peter Royal [mailto:proyal@apache.org] >> >>On Thursday 01 August 2002 05:21 pm, Berin Loritsch wrote: >> >>>>From: Michael Stanley [mailto:mstanley@mitre.org] >>>> >>>>For a technology that was marketed as language independent, it's >>>>sure interesting to see this trend of re-writing code. :-) >>> >>>I don't think anyone wants to use MS JDK 1.1.4 for real... >> >>Would it not have been easier to use "J# for .NET" though? >>http://msdn.microsoft.com/vjsharp/default.asp > > > > That's what J# is: MS JDK 1.1.4 under a new name. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: