Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 54965 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2002 13:39:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2002 13:39:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 16276 invoked by uid 97); 28 Aug 2002 13:39:57 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16246 invoked by uid 97); 28 Aug 2002 13:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16234 invoked by uid 98); 28 Aug 2002 13:39:56 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) From: Peter Royal To: "Avalon Developers List" Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:34:52 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <200208282104.49055.peter@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <200208282104.49055.peter@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200208280934.53008.proyal@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: Re: Version is an attribute? Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday 28 August 2002 07:04 am, Peter Donald wrote: > For a while we have supported versioning interfaces in Phoenix and only > matching against specific version and so forth. In reality very few people > used this and just left the default version at 1.0 > > Any reason why this can not be made a attribute? I see no reason. But I also don't see anything lost in keeping it as-is, especially since it could be useful down the road.. -pete -- peter royal -> proyal@apache.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: