avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@s-und-n.de>
Subject RE: Releasing excalibur subprojects
Date Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:23:31 GMT

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ah, the good old discussion about commons vs. avalon. Great!
>
> It's not a discussion, it's a simple fact.
> If a component has no needed dependencies to Avalon Framework, it should
> go in Commons.
>
Agreed.

> >>Now more specific points:
> >>- xmlutil -1: seems like a package for xml-commons, no Avalon dependency
> >>
> >
> > Hmm, xmlutil provides Avalon components. I'm fine with moving them if
> > xml-commons wants to have a dependency on avalon.
>
> Sorry, I somehow looked at another xmlutil package I had on my hd, in
> fact yes, they are Avalon xml components.
>
> +1
>
Ah, this saves my day!

> BTW, I would /personally/ not call them xmlutil, but simply xml, as
> javax.xml...
> Usually *util is used for helper classes and static methods, which is
> not the case here.
>
I think it was called xml but renamed later - or do I suffer from a
weak memory?

Carsten


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message