avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <mcconn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Move instrument core to framework. (Was Re: [altrmi] adding components to assist in connection pooling..)
Date Thu, 08 Aug 2002 18:36:54 GMT

Peter Royal wrote:

>On Thursday 08 August 2002 11:17 am, Leif Mortenson wrote:
>>    What would you think of moving the core instrument classes over to
>>framework?  That would
>>make it easier to integrate it more fully into various avalon components
>>without having to worry
>>about dependency issues.   Another option would be to move the
>>instrument manager and client
>>classes back into a seperate instrument-manager package.
>>    Thoughts?
>I had a long message ranting about the split written but decided not to send 
>it :)
>Pushing the core into framework would work, but I think splitting the core and 
>the client/mgr back into separate excacalibur subprojects might be best.

Any reason why this can't live as one excalibur project that happens to 
have three subprojects within it?




Stephen J. McConnell

digital products for a global economy

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message