avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <mcconn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Move instrument core to framework. (Was Re: [altrmi] adding components to assist in connection pooling..)
Date Thu, 08 Aug 2002 18:36:54 GMT


Peter Royal wrote:

>On Thursday 08 August 2002 11:17 am, Leif Mortenson wrote:
>  
>
>>    What would you think of moving the core instrument classes over to
>>framework?  That would
>>make it easier to integrate it more fully into various avalon components
>>without having to worry
>>about dependency issues.   Another option would be to move the
>>instrument manager and client
>>classes back into a seperate instrument-manager package.
>>
>>    Thoughts?
>>    
>>
>
>I had a long message ranting about the split written but decided not to send 
>it :)
>
>Pushing the core into framework would work, but I think splitting the core and 
>the client/mgr back into separate excacalibur subprojects might be best.
>-pete
>  
>

Any reason why this can't live as one excalibur project that happens to 
have three subprojects within it?

Steve.


>  
>

-- 

Stephen J. McConnell

OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:mcconnell@osm.net
http://www.osm.net




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message