Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 79482 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2002 23:21:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2002 23:21:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 2696 invoked by uid 97); 27 Jul 2002 23:22:11 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 2648 invoked by uid 97); 27 Jul 2002 23:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 2636 invoked by uid 98); 27 Jul 2002 23:22:10 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <3D432B96.4000909@osm.net> Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 01:24:06 +0200 From: Stephen McConnell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: excalibur manifest declaration issue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Following on from some discussion with the James group I was checking into depedencies they have with Avalon - and in particular - attempting to seperate this in terms of Framework, Excalibur package XXX, Phoenix, and Phoenix Block XXX. One the james members provided me with a short-list of excalibur depedencies: org.apache.avalon.excalibur.io.* org.apache.avalon.excalibur.thread.* org.apache.avalon.excalibur.datasource.* org.apache.avalon.excalibur.collections.* When looking at the manifest declarations for the excalibur components for io, thread, datasource and collections, I noticed that none contain the declarations of the extensions they are depedendent on. As the manifest files in Excalibur are (generally) created automatically, can the procedure be extended to include generation of extension depedencies ? Cheers, Steve. -- Stephen J. McConnell OSM SARL digital products for a global economy mailto:mcconnell@osm.net http://www.osm.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: