Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 29623 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2002 17:13:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by 209.66.108.5 with SMTP; 26 Jun 2002 17:13:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 24593 invoked by uid 97); 26 Jun 2002 17:13:27 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 24576 invoked by uid 97); 26 Jun 2002 17:13:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 24560 invoked by uid 98); 26 Jun 2002 17:13:26 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Reply-To: From: "Berin Loritsch" To: "'Avalon Developers List'" Subject: RE: [Heads Up] Updated the Java headers to use the full license in Framework Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:13:17 -0400 Message-ID: <007001c21d34$c3963060$ac00a8c0@Gabriel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <3D198BC2.4C582620@apache.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: 209.66.108.5 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: 209.66.108.5 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:stefano@apache.org] > > Peter Donald wrote: > > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 07:10, Peter Royal wrote: > > > On Tuesday 25 June 2002 05:09 pm, Peter Donald wrote: > > > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:41, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > > > > The commit message was too big, so it got rejected. > > > > > > > > You know I am going to revert this as soon as I have to > edit the > > > > files. > > > > > > Out of curiosity, what's proper from a "apache foundation > covering > > > their ass" standpoint? > > > > Depends on who you ask. The head of Apache said short form is fine, > > another apache board member saids it is evil. Both have consulted > > lawyers so take your pick ;) > > The ASF member list with the Apache licensing commitee came > up with an informal resolution that *strongly* suggests to > use the full version until the Apache License 2.0 is ready. > The new license is legally designed to allow boilerplating. > > So, please, until the new license is out, let's use the full > license even if it's longer. Thanks. It appears Peter already reverted the change :( I don't want to get into a pissing contest with him over this issue, so I will let someone else try and convert him. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: