avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ComponentVerifier exceptions
Date Sat, 08 Jun 2002 06:28:22 GMT
At 08:17 AM 6/8/2002 +0200, you wrote:

>The current implementation of ComponentVerifier does not make a 
>distinction between a verification error and a verification warning.  I 
>think we should consider the addition of a VerifyWarning as a type of 
>exeception that can be thrown during verification  that indicates bad 
>For example, a component implementing both Composable and Serviceable is 
>inconsitent but computationally possible.  Such a condition could throw a 
>VerificationWarning as opposed to the current VerifyException (the same 
>case applies for the mixing of Parameterizable and Configurable) thrown by 
>the verifyLifecycle method.
>VerifyWarning candidates include:
>  verifyPublic
>  verifyLifecycles
>  verifyServiceIsaInterface
>  verifyServiceNotALifecycle

If there is a such a thing as a warning it should result in error message 
but the rest of verification process should continue or else later stages 
in container managing will fail. So I think if a container wishes for 
certain things to be warnings then they should subclass the verifier to 
perform their container specific validations.

The other alternative would be to create a VerifyEvent + VerifyListener but 
I played with that for a while and the added complexity was not justified 
given the added complexity it would introduce.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message