avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <mcconn...@osm.net>
Subject Re: [proposal] avalon 5 ComponentManager interface
Date Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:59:38 GMT

Berin Loritsch wrote:

>>From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:mcconnell@osm.net] 
>>Leo Sutic wrote:
>>>The need for hints exist because we have decided that the
>>>role should be an interface name.
>>Slowdown here - can anyone/someone please refer me to any Avalon 
>>framework documentation anywhere that states a role is an interface 
>>name?  Please - let's not get mixed up between decisions 
>>concerning ECM. 
>> The CM/SM is not and does not inherit from ECM.
>Developing with Avalon?
>It's a decision we came to a long time ago.

The "decision" is not documented in the CM/SM interfaces - is not 
enforced by anything in the framework least of all 
DefaultComponentManager or DefaultServiceManager.  But the worst thing 
of all is that implies the potential interpritation of the lookup key on 
a CM/SM manager implemetation. The decision I accept is the decision 
expressed by the CM/SM interfaces and the javadoc that goes with them.

Cheers, Steve.


Stephen J. McConnell

digital products for a global economy

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message