avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: organisation of avalon subprojects
Date Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:44:40 GMT
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:24, Leo Sutic wrote:
>  > This has to be solved - existance of different semantic approaches
>  > to component management mean that components are designed
>  > and implememtated today relative to a target container family. We
>  > have two semantic models - the ECM/Fortress/MicroContainer model
>  > and the containerkit/Phoenix/Merlin. Either of these two approaches
>  > must die or we must make a formal distrinction between them and live
>  > with the consequences.
>
> Is this the component-as-service difference? I.e. in
> contaierkit/Phoenix/Merlin all components are what the ECM world calls
> ThreadSafe?

Nope. The components do not state or enforce any sort of lifecycle style. It 
is up to assembler to assemble it correctly for their particular components.

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
-------------------------------------------------------
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme 
excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the 
enemy's resistance without fighting. - Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.
-------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message