avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: organisation of avalon subprojects
Date Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:44:40 GMT
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:24, Leo Sutic wrote:
>  > This has to be solved - existance of different semantic approaches
>  > to component management mean that components are designed
>  > and implememtated today relative to a target container family. We
>  > have two semantic models - the ECM/Fortress/MicroContainer model
>  > and the containerkit/Phoenix/Merlin. Either of these two approaches
>  > must die or we must make a formal distrinction between them and live
>  > with the consequences.
> Is this the component-as-service difference? I.e. in
> contaierkit/Phoenix/Merlin all components are what the ECM world calls
> ThreadSafe?

Nope. The components do not state or enforce any sort of lifecycle style. It 
is up to assembler to assemble it correctly for their particular components.


Peter Donald
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme 
excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the 
enemy's resistance without fighting. - Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

View raw message