avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Royal <pro...@managingpartners.com>
Subject Re: AbstractInstrumentable extends AbstractLoggable
Date Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:42:56 GMT
On Thursday 18 April 2002 11:34 am, Leif Mortenson wrote:
> I committed the original patch. I would rather not have Instrument have
> any dependencies.
> Maybe having an AbstractLogEnabledInstrumentable in the logger subproject?

That would introduce a dependency on Instrument in Logger, right?

> Not too unmovable on adding the dependency, but it is nice to have it
> independent.
> If the AbstractLogEnabledInstrumentable class was in addition to the
> AbstractInstrumentable
> class, then the dependency would only be at compile time and so users
> who were not using
> framework could still use the Instrumentable classes.
>
> Thoughts?

Create another subproject to that contains the class that will have a 
dependency on Instrument and Logger? Perhaps even an "integration" subproject 
to handle these cases.
-pete

-- 
peter royal -> proyal@managingpartners.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message