avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <nicola...@apache.org>
Subject Re: We go repackaging alpha stage excalibur packages?
Date Tue, 09 Apr 2002 15:04:16 GMT
ROTFL :-D

--
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: "Leo Sutic" <leo.sutic@inspireinfrastructure.com>
To: "Avalon Developers List" <avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: We go repackaging alpha stage excalibur packages?




Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>  From: "Leo Sutic" <leo.sutic@inspireinfrastructure.com>
>
>>Was there any concensus on what to do with
>>framework? Do we go with:
>>
>>org.apache.avalon.framework
>>org.apache.avalon
>>org.apache.framework
>
>
> Then, why not rename Avalon to .  ?

+1000

org.apache.avalon.framework =>
___._.__..._.__..__._........_..._._._..____...._.._..___.._____._._._

which should have many advantages, the least of those being easy application
of checksums to import statements when we do make the move to just:

___._.__..._.__..__._........_..._._._..____..


I see no need for a lengthy 6 hours of maintaining backward compatibility
with this.

/LS



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message