Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 18779 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2002 01:53:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2002 01:53:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 4854 invoked by uid 97); 16 Feb 2002 01:53:37 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4838 invoked by uid 97); 16 Feb 2002 01:53:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4827 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2002 01:53:36 -0000 Message-Id: <200202160153.g1G1rYZ03699@mail012.syd.optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Peter Donald To: "Avalon Developers List" Subject: Re: [VOTE] RE: ComponentManager interface Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 12:49:48 +1100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Wisdom-Cookie: . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:07, Paulo Gaspar wrote: > I really think that my silly token based mechanism is much > lighter and efficient than a child CM would be. How so? I can't see any difference at all ... -- Cheers, Pete ------------------------- All things considered, insanity may be the only reasonable alternative. ------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: