Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 53741 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 10:54:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 2001 10:54:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 23377 invoked by uid 97); 14 Nov 2001 10:54:32 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23361 invoked by uid 97); 14 Nov 2001 10:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23350 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 10:54:31 -0000 From: "Gerhard Froehlich" To: "Avalon Developers List" Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-avalon-cornerstone/apps/db/src/java/org/apache/avalon/db/functions Function.java Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:54:25 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <3BF1943C.90706@yahoo.com> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yup your rigth B & J, that's was really a heedless commit (copy & paste == evil!!) Cheers Gerhard >-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Hammant [mailto:Paul_Hammant@yahoo.com] >Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:44 PM >To: Avalon Developers List >Subject: Re: cvs commit: >jakarta-avalon-cornerstone/apps/db/src/java/org/apache/avalon/db/functio >ns Function.java > > >Berin & Jeremias, > >Yup your right. It's my fault reeally. Our abstract parent class should >extends AbstractLogEnabled and the pure function interface will extend >nothing. > >Regards, > >- Paul H > >>> Is it a good idea to extend a work interface from a life cycle >>> interface like >>> LogEnabled? Doesn't this break the idea of "Separation of Concerns" or >>> something like that? I can't say that I understood everthing about >>> Avalon, yet. Still learning... But this struck me as odd. Would someone >>> be so kind as to enlighten me? Thanks a lot. >> >> >> >> You are correct. LogEnabled is an implementation detail, and not part >> of the >> Role of the Component. >> > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: >For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: