Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 47997 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 15:11:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osaka.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.133) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 15:11:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 7623 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 15:13:53 -0000 Received: from nagoya.betaversion.org (192.18.49.131) by osaka.betaversion.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 15:13:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 7441 invoked by uid 97); 31 Oct 2001 15:11:38 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7422 invoked by uid 97); 31 Oct 2001 15:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7394 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 15:11:36 -0000 From: "Stephen McConnell" To: "Avalon Developers List" Subject: RE: Check this alternative to Loggable Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:12:24 +0100 Message-ID: <000d01c1621e$71de75b0$0a01a8c0@osm.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800 In-reply-to: <3BE0134D.B620EEFE@apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Loritsch wrote: > Peter Royal wrote: > > > > At 09:21 AM 10/31/2001 -0500, you wrote: > > >It is in ${jakarta-avalon}/src/proposal/logger-v2/ > > > > ah, i was looking in ${jakarta-avalon}/proposal. > > > > Why did you rename setLogger to enableLogging? Just to prevent > > confusion? > > > > otherwise looks good from the peanut gallery. > > -pete > > The main gist of the proposal is to migrate from using the > LogKit Logger to the Logger interface included in Avalon > Framework. So yes, it is to prevent confusion. > > Although, we can have both methods named setLogger(). > > That way, if folks do not have to rewrite anything--just > change the import statement for Logger. I would definately prefer to stay with "setLogger" for two reasons, firstly, the change impact is less, and secondly, I don't see any confusion here. Cheers, Steve. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: