Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8426 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2001 07:04:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Avalon Development" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8414 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2001 07:04:26 -0000 X-Sent: 28 Aug 2001 07:03:56 GMT From: "Leo Simons" To: "Avalon Development" Subject: RE: [Vote] Rana Bhattacharyya's FtpServer Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:04:09 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B8B3AC2.6020109@yahoo.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > >>3) rename from "plain" FtpServer to AptSnarf (anagram of "Rana's > >>FTP") as Apache does not do plain > >>names. > >> > > > >My choice would be simply "Avalon FTP Server" as it is quite clear > >and correct a description and solidifies the avalon brand name. > > > This seems to be a common objection, and "Avalon FTP Server" has some > simplicity to it. What package name? aftps? works for me... > >On another subject, this is the third app we're putting > >in cornerstone that is not really a cornerstone. Time to > >vote on an jakart-avalon-applications cvs, perhaps? > >(containing the FTP Server, the proxy server (which is > >called HTTP Proxy) and XCommander (which perhaps should > >be called Avalan XML Socket Server)). > > Well, HTTPProxy is quite lightweight on features, and though there could > be more, is definately only a demo at the moment. XCommander is quite > descriptive - I thought, but yes, a move to apps/ would be good. XCommander was a programming exercise where I had a valid use case ("a generic framework to ease the development of XML Socket Programs communicating with the Flash 5 plugin") and it ended up being more useful than most existing products (at that time, dev in this area is fast). Since most people use it not as an example/demo but as an app, it should probably be branded as such.> > All of these apps should generate different SAR files - yes? Whereas > the demos and cornerstone fundamentals could share one... yup. Are we all in agreement? grz, - Leo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org