avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <dona...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Excalibur Component Manager naming
Date Wed, 30 May 2001 14:54:36 GMT
At 10:10 AM 5/30/01 -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
>Due to the response that the naming of the Excalibur's Component Manager
>is confusing, I propose to deprecate Excalibur's DefaultComponentManager
>and rename the class to ExcaliburComponentManager.
>
>
>More than one person has found that simply package name differentiation
>is not enough.  The goal is to have a relatively easily comprehensible
>system.  We should avoid unnecessary confusion (which this is) whenever
>possible.

+1

As long as we leave a deprecated 

class DefaultComponentManager extends ExcaliburComponentManager {}

around for a while.
	
Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message