Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 82616 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2001 18:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Avalon Development" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 82360 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2001 18:45:26 -0000 From: "Leo Simons" To: "Avalon Development" Subject: RE: Framework -> Stable ??? Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:43:56 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010404010209.00e40300@alphalink.com.au> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > >> Initially I wanted to separate out implementation and > interfaces but given > >> our tight deadline I no longer think that is pertinent for > this version. > > > >Are we talking an official version 3.x or version 4.0? > > I was thinking we up the framework classes to 4.0... Ah. 4.0 should be stable, right? What's the deadline exactly for it to become beta? I've noticed more than a few things in the proposal I think need changing before we set them in stone... (like: - improvement of Exception definitions - I don't think they're granular enough or properly nested yet - downcasting of return types in several places (can't remember right now) (...) - I have a little list somewhere among this pile of papers...) cheers! Leo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org