Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Avalon Development" <avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-ID: <3AE05D3C.9CE8B41E@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 12:01:00 -0400
From: Berin Loritsch <bloritsch@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Avalon Development <avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [vote] Excalibur CVS
References: <000001c0c9af$d0798ae0$0a01a8c0@osm.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Stephen McConnell wrote:
> 
> [last para from Berin email]
> > To be honest, I would have a real problem if we didn't go beta because
> > you didn't get to remove excalibur into a new CVS.  According to all the
> > feedback, noone agrees with the move--so why do it?  And why punish those
> > of us who want beta and stability because we don't have a separate CVS?
> 
> Can I just confirm a couple of things -
> perhaps its just me sifting through what is noise and what is serious....
> but I would appreciate confirmation of the following two points:
> 
>   1. there was a proposed creating a new CVS to which there was uniform
>      disagreement ... therefore, I am presuming that it now off the agenda
>      (after all, this is an open process - and votes count)

Yes. (Hopefully noone thinks it is still on the agenda for beta release)

>   2. I'm assuming the "veto" comment was off-the-cuff and should not be
>      taken seriously ... (but if I'm wrong, then there is a very serious
>      issue!)

I sure hope so.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org