Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16819 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2001 00:32:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Avalon Development" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16768 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2001 00:32:30 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010426102535.01160600@mail.alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@mail.alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:25:35 +1000 To: "Avalon Development" From: Peter Donald Subject: RE: [phoenix] JMX Management - the good, the bad and the ugly Cc: "Avalon Development" In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.6.32.20010426020202.00ce4e40@mail.alphalink.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 09:17 25/4/01 +0200, Leo Simons wrote: >> >> DynamicMbeanFactory will throw exceptions when there is >> get/is/set methods >> >> that don't conform to JavaBeans standard where I think it should just >> >> ignore them (Leo can you confirm that???). >> > >> >No (sorry). According to the specification, an object that us not a valid >> >JavaBeam/MBean will not be exposed. have no problem with going against >> >that spec...it'd mean we could never claim actual JMX compliance though. >> >> We are compliant with JavaBeans (they say ignore anything that doesn't fit >> pattern) >> however your implementation assumes that if they start with get >> they MUST bet a getter (which is not true in our case). Same with >> is and set. > >I fixed that, didn't I? >whoops...old copy in the CVS...ouch. ;) >addendum: that might be tomorrow...actually thought it was the day >after tomorrow today, so that my imaginary tomorrow would be the >weekend. This is of course not the case as today is today and that >other tomorrow is actually be a few days away which is why I did not >say what I ment. (if you followed that on the first run, congrats. >You're used to structural programming ;) alternatively you used to be a logic student ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org