Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4734 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2001 21:27:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Avalon Development" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4691 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2001 21:27:35 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010314082951.00ae18e0@alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:29:51 +1100 To: "Avalon Development" From: Peter Donald Subject: Re: [Vote] End of line bracing ;-) Cc: Avalon In-Reply-To: <20010313212251.16982.qmail@web122.yahoomail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 01:22 13/3/01 -0800, Paul Hammant wrote: >We came close to adopting this in Dec and Peter's touched on it again. I think we may have had a >majority before but not enacted it. > >if (coder.hasRealExperienceOfBothTypesOfBracing()) { > if(all.inAgreement()) { > bracing.endOfLine(true); > } else { > bracing.leaveAsIsTillMorePeopleTryInTheOtherWayAndPledgeNotToGoBack(true); > } >} > >+0.5 -1 for all the reasons said before on the list ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org