avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eung-ju Park" <co...@isoft.co.kr>
Subject Re: [vote] long term logging proposal
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:30:57 GMT
LogKit is
easy to understand, clean and faster than Log4J.

I think LogKit is batter than Log4J in Avalon at least.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Leo Simons" <mail@leosimons.com>
To: "Avalon Development" <avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 5:42 PM
Subject: [vote] long term logging proposal


> In Avalon 4, move to Log4j in favor of the current LogKit,
> for the reasons explained in my other e-mail:
> 
> - we offer more logging features to people building on top
> of Avalon.
> - we remove the duplicity of having two logging packages
> on Jakarta.
> - we get the advantages of a larger developer pool and more
> synergy between Jakarta projects.
> 
> These reasons are, IMO, enough to warrant the work and the
> speed loss.
> 
> So, here's my +1
> 
> 
> Leo Simons
> (hehehe. My first vote is on my own proposal =)
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: avalon-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message