Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010226002010.0095a9b0@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:20:10 +1100
To: "Avalon Development" <avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
From: Peter Donald <donaldp@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Util
Cc: Avalon Development <avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <3A99052F.74E06504@betaversion.org>
References: <3.0.6.32.20010225115614.00906480@alphalink.com.au>
 <3.0.6.32.20010225135603.0081ba70@alphalink.com.au>
 <3.0.6.32.20010225223937.00903900@alphalink.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 05:14  25/2/01 -0800, Federico Barbieri wrote:
>Peter Donald wrote:
>> 
>> At 03:09  25/2/01 -0800, Federico Barbieri wrote:
>> >> >I'll upload the proposal later today.
>> >>
>> >> kewl - could it be in proposal/4.0 or proposal/red or something
similar ;)
>> >
>> >done. There is a changes.txt. More work is needed thou.
>> 
>> Could you move it to proposal/4.0/src/java instead of src/proposal-4.0
>> because will eventually need to alter the remaining build process etc to
>> match the proposal (like excludes if j2ee.jar not present). This way the
>> proposal is completely decoupled from real source tree. Probably the best
>> way to do this is to just log into daedelus and move it manually on
>> filesystem.
>> 
>
>done. I'll create a proposal/build.xml as well tomorrow (it's 5.15 am
>and I'm feeling sleepy... :-).

egads ! 

Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*