Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9963F200D1E for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:48:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9815B160BEA; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DE0291609DE for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 15108 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2017 21:48:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact reviews-help@aurora.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: reviews@aurora.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list reviews@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 15097 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2017 21:48:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 205D9C41A4; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.249 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, KAM_LOTSOFHASH=0.25, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8r9MP70DQWhX; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id CF34F5F3DE; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from reviews.apache.org (unknown [10.41.0.12]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6237FE06BB; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from reviews-vm2.apache.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by reviews.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at reviews-vm2.apache.org) with ESMTP id 47218C4123D; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4458546775101862202==" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Review Request 62956: When scheduling, skip offers with no CPU and no mem From: Stephan Erb To: David McLaughlin , Jordan Ly Cc: Bill Farner , Aurora Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20171018214808.63763.35148@reviews-vm2.apache.org> X-ReviewBoard-URL: https://reviews.apache.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Sender: Stephan Erb X-ReviewGroup: Aurora X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, OOF, AutoReply X-ReviewRequest-URL: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62956/ X-Sender: Stephan Erb X-ReviewBoard-ShipIt: 1 References: <20171018212503.63799.14433@reviews-vm2.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20171018212503.63799.14433@reviews-vm2.apache.org> X-ReviewBoard-Diff-For: src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/HostOfferTest.java Reply-To: Stephan Erb X-ReviewRequest-Repository: aurora archived-at: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:48:14 -0000 --===============4458546775101862202== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62956/#review188586 ----------------------------------------------------------- Ship it! src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/HostOffer.java Lines 44-47 (patched) Please extend this comment a bit and indicate that this checks for the absence of revocable and non-revocable resources. src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/HostOffer.java Lines 62-66 (patched) I have had a short peek at our clusters and the number of offers matching this criteria would be very low. It could be increased if we'd use a higher bound like 0.1 CPU and 64mb memory as those would already be needed as executor overhead. I suspect for Twitter even using 0 as abound is significant though? Correct? src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssigner.java Lines 295-296 (patched) For consistency with the other early aborts below, write this in form of an `if` with a `continue` statement? (I don't feel strongly about this though. It just feels a little bit weird that this is handled differently here) - Stephan Erb On Oct. 18, 2017, 11:25 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/62956/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 18, 2017, 11:25 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Jordan Ly. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > There's no reason for us to evaluate offers with no CPUs or memory, so reject them early in the offer lifecycle. > > This is an incremental performance optimization, but it may net significant improvements based on observations in some very large clusters. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/HostOffer.java bc40d0798f40003cab5bf6efe607217e4d5de9f1 > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/Utilization.java 3c77e2983ce00f897f3d5ed106b779cd7f7f0940 > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/preemptor/PreemptionVictimFilter.java 1b1239753f40d7d46d91724def6c25037eb79f1c > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/resources/ResourceBag.java d5db81b88a0369d0b26c8fbf70efab3886ad7695 > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskAssigner.java e35720fca903cdcd27fff50f12ece9cc615f5d54 > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/stats/TaskStatCalculator.java b98aaaf48ae60afef19a368ee96abc897300f8fa > src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/HostOfferTest.java PRE-CREATION > src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/OfferManagerImplTest.java 2cfdc090ff75a63111ae146c9fe7b3542e7ac83f > src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/offers/Offers.java 129b4437315c6ad4ea47ca75d4ae6e28cadd7911 > src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/resources/ResourceTestUtil.java 765a527acb96997989c920be8b69dfa1113dc302 > src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/FirstFitTaskAssignerTest.java a74efbdc55383cd748f52cd55e1a94551d7d2ba1 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62956/diff/4/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Bill Farner > > --===============4458546775101862202==--