Mailing-List: contact reviews-help@aurora.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: reviews@aurora.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="===============6925834977077841613=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Review Request 60354: Observer task page to load consumption info
 from history
From: Aurora ReviewBot <wfarner@apache.org>
To: Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham <santhoshkumar.s@gmail.com>,
 David McLaughlin <david@dmclaughlin.com>
Cc: Aurora ReviewBot <wfarner@apache.org>,
 Reza Motamedi <reza.motamedi@gmail.com>, Aurora <reviews@aurora.apache.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:07:02 -0000
Message-ID: <20170622160702.61730.60091@reviews-vm2.apache.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Sender: Aurora ReviewBot <noreply@reviews.apache.org>
References: <20170622152843.61729.39664@reviews-vm2.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170622152843.61729.39664@reviews-vm2.apache.org>
Reply-To: Aurora ReviewBot <wfarner@apache.org>
archived-at: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:07:11 -0000

--===============6925834977077841613==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60354/#review178696
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!


Master (13055df) is green with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On June 22, 2017, 5:28 p.m., Reza Motamedi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60354/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 22, 2017, 5:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> # Observer task page to load consumption info from history
> 
> Resource consumptions of Thermos Processes are periodically calculated by TaskResourceMonitor threads (one thread per Thermos task). This information is used to display a (semi) fresh state of the tasks running on a host in the Observer host page, aka landing page. An aggregate history of the consumptions is kept at the task level, although TaskResourceMonitor needs to first collect the resource at the Process level and then aggregate them.
> 
> On the other hand, when an Observer _task page_ is visited, the resources consumption of Thermos Processes within that task are calculated again and displayed without being aggregated. This can become very slow since time to complete resource calculation is affected by the load on the host.
> 
> By applying this patch we take advantage of the periodic work and fulfill information resource requested in Observer task page from already collected resource consumptions.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/monitoring/resource.py 434666696e600a0e6c19edd986c86575539976f2 
>   src/test/python/apache/thermos/monitoring/test_resource.py d794a998f1d9fc52ba260cd31ac444aee7f8ed28 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60354/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I stress tested this patch on a host that had a slow Observer page. Interestingly, I did not need to do much to make the Observer slow. There are a few points to be made clear first.
> - We at Twitter limit the resources allocated to the Observer using `systemd`. The observer is allowed to use only 20% of a CPU core. The attached screen shots are from such a setup.
> - Having assigned 20% of a cpu core to Observer, starting only 8 `task`s, each with 3 `process`es is enough to make the Observer slow; 11secs to load `task page`.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> page load timing stats with the patch - chrome water fall view
>   https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2017/06/22/6cec6645-6a2d-46bb-997f-fef53bb15c19__with_patch_-_Screen_Shot_2017-06-21_at_10.17.24_PM.png
> page load timing stats without the patch - chrome water fall view
>   https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2017/06/22/0916cd47-07ec-48da-bf52-9560c21c1f60__without_patch_-_Screen_Shot_2017-06-21_at_10.16.28_PM.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Reza Motamedi
> 
>


--===============6925834977077841613==--