aurora-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David McLaughlin <da...@dmclaughlin.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 58922: Make sure we track scheduling penalty when no tasks are scheduled.
Date Tue, 02 May 2017 17:13:22 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58922/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated May 2, 2017, 5:13 p.m.)


Review request for Aurora, Mehrdad Nurolahzade, Reza Motamedi, Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham,
and Stephan Erb.


Changes
-------

Added context.


Repository: aurora


Description (updated)
-------

Make sure we track scheduling penalty when no tasks are scheduled.

Note on change: discovered testing https://reviews.apache.org/r/58259/. We were not accumulating
the penalty when no tasks in a batch were scheduled (which is a common case for preemption
candidates and update batches that are waiting on reservations).


Diffs
-----

  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/scheduling/TaskGroups.java cea8d0f0795acfd3bbe2f1ee120ec047eee34e0f



Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58922/diff/1/


Testing
-------

N/A


Thanks,

David McLaughlin


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message