aurora-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Erb <s...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 38210: [aurora-packaging] Adds Monit supervisor support for EL6
Date Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:05:47 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38210/#review172215
-----------------------------------------------------------



We are only officially supporing Centos-7 as of today. It relies on systemd and thus would
not require monit. Please feel free to re-open if you disagree.

- Stephan Erb


On Sept. 9, 2015, 8:56 a.m., Steve Salevan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38210/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 9, 2015, 8:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Joe Smith, Kevin Sweeney, and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1480
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1480
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora-packaging
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> As requested by AURORA-1480, this RB adds Monit as a runtime requirement for the aurora
and aurora-thermos packages alongside some basic Monit scripts to properly supervise these
processes.
> 
> Let me know what you think and thanks!
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   specs/rpm/SOURCES/aurora.monit PRE-CREATION 
>   specs/rpm/SOURCES/thermos-observer.monit PRE-CREATION 
>   specs/rpm/aurora.spec cf9c2715106a27fcb71447b5453ad3b847d2235a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38210/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested Monit scripts against a local machine
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Salevan
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message