Mailing-List: contact reviews-help@aurora.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: reviews@aurora.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="===============7462607241996188797=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Review Request 33778: Adds RPM specfile and support scripting
From: "Steve Salevan" <steve.salevan@gmail.com>
To: "Bill Farner" <wfarner@apache.org>, "Kevin Sweeney" <kevints@apache.org>,
 "Jake Farrell" <jfarrell@apache.org>
Cc: "Steve Salevan" <steve.salevan@gmail.com>,
 "Aurora" <reviews@aurora.apache.org>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 05:16:41 -0000
Message-ID: <20150508051641.1562.5369@reviews.apache.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Sender: "Steve Salevan" <noreply@reviews.apache.org>
References: <20150504193108.20176.96817@reviews.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150504193108.20176.96817@reviews.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Steve Salevan" <steve.salevan@gmail.com>

--===============7462607241996188797==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> On May 4, 2015, 7:31 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > We've had success with using vagrant to serve as test beds and build environments for things like this [1].  Docker might be a boon here, as we can use that in ASF's jenkins.
> > 
> > Don't hesitate to punt on this for now, as it's not a ship-blocker for me...but i'm curious if you have any thoughts on this.
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/build-support/python/make-mesos-native-egg
> 
> Jake Farrell wrote:
>     Though your bash-foo in make-mesos-native-egg is nice I would be a big +1 to using docker for that as well as the packaging (rpm/deb), would love to see both of the packages built that way using something like build-support/docker/${os}/

I agree that Docker might be our best bet, as our next logical step is in figuring out a way to stand up nightly builds and a Yum repo to contain them.  To do so we'll want to establish a base Docker image with the necessary BuildRequires for each supported platform (EL 6/7, F19/20/21) and then write a script that'll run through the RPM build procedure and copy the resulting RPMs to some persistent storage, where we can then regenerate the Yum metadata.


- Steve


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33778/#review82421
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 8, 2015, 5:08 a.m., Steve Salevan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33778/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 8, 2015, 5:08 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Jake Farrell, Kevin Sweeney, and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1116
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1116
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This review board adds support for building Red Hat-flavored packages for the Aurora scheduler alongside its client and Thermos-related binaries:
> 
> aurora - Aurora Scheduler
> aurora-client - Aurora client and admin tool
> aurora-thermos - Thermos executor, runner, and observer
> aurora-debuginfo - Debugging symbols for Python/libmesos integration
> 
> If you'd like to give it a whirl, the following Make targets will spin up new RPMs:
> 
> make (nightly_srpm|nightly_rpm) - builds an RPM or SRPM with timestamped versioning, suitable for producing nightly updates
> make (release_srpm|release_rpm) - builds without timestamped versioning
> 
> Let me know what you think, and thanks!
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   packaging/rpm/Makefile PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/aurora.init.sh PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/aurora.logrotate PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/aurora.service PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/aurora.spec PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/aurora.startup.sh PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/aurora.sysconfig PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/clusters.json PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/thermos-observer.init.sh PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/thermos-observer.logrotate PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/thermos-observer.service PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/thermos-observer.startup.sh PRE-CREATION 
>   packaging/rpm/thermos-observer.sysconfig PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33778/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Successfully executed builds on EL 6/7 and F19/20, tested deployment on EL6 and F19
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Salevan
> 
>


--===============7462607241996188797==--