aurora-reviews mailing list archives: April 2015

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: Review Request 32221: Remove excessively low timeout in SIGTERM swallowing test.
Joe Smith   Re: Review Request 32221: Remove excessively low timeout in SIGTERM swallowing test. Wed, 01 Apr, 05:34
Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters Wed, 01 Apr, 16:19
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters Wed, 01 Apr, 16:25
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters Wed, 01 Apr, 17:45
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters Wed, 01 Apr, 20:57
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters Wed, 01 Apr, 21:46
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters Fri, 03 Apr, 20:02
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters Fri, 03 Apr, 20:03
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32329: Extract job key from RPC parameters Fri, 03 Apr, 20:33
Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler
Joshua Cohen   Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Wed, 01 Apr, 17:45
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Thu, 02 Apr, 17:23
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Fri, 03 Apr, 21:18
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Fri, 03 Apr, 21:18
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Fri, 03 Apr, 22:44
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Fri, 03 Apr, 22:46
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Fri, 03 Apr, 21:19
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Fri, 03 Apr, 21:21
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Mon, 06 Apr, 17:56
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Mon, 06 Apr, 18:24
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Wed, 08 Apr, 20:34
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Thu, 09 Apr, 02:35
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 32559: Add Kerberos support to the scheduler Thu, 09 Apr, 18:44
Re: Review Request 32295: Make health check configurable
Brian Wickman   Re: Review Request 32295: Make health check configurable Wed, 01 Apr, 18:26
Brian Brazil     Re: Review Request 32295: Make health check configurable Wed, 01 Apr, 18:53
Brian Wickman     Re: Review Request 32295: Make health check configurable Fri, 03 Apr, 17:07
Brian Wickman   Re: Review Request 32295: Make health check configurable Fri, 03 Apr, 17:07
Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support.
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Wed, 01 Apr, 19:53
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Wed, 01 Apr, 19:53
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Wed, 01 Apr, 20:21
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Wed, 01 Apr, 20:40
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Thu, 02 Apr, 01:09
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Thu, 02 Apr, 01:25
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Thu, 02 Apr, 16:33
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Thu, 02 Apr, 17:33
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Wed, 08 Apr, 20:36
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 22:38
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 22:55
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 23:41
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Thu, 02 Apr, 01:10
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Thu, 02 Apr, 01:15
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Thu, 02 Apr, 17:33
Aurora ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Thu, 02 Apr, 17:45
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Mon, 06 Apr, 18:10
Brian Wickman         Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Tue, 07 Apr, 17:21
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 22:38
Aurora ReviewBot           Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 22:42
Maxim Khutornenko           Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 22:45
Kevin Sweeney             Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 22:52
Maxim Khutornenko               Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 23:41
Aurora ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 23:09
Maxim Khutornenko             Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Fri, 10 Apr, 23:42
Kevin Sweeney               Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Sat, 11 Apr, 00:02
Aurora ReviewBot               Re: Review Request 32541: Adding client Kerberos support. Sat, 11 Apr, 00:02
Re: Review Request 32352: Making preemptor asynchronous. Part 3(final) - background service.
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32352: Making preemptor asynchronous. Part 3(final) - background service. Wed, 01 Apr, 20:03
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32352: Making preemptor asynchronous. Part 3(final) - background service. Wed, 01 Apr, 22:00
Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency.
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Thu, 02 Apr, 23:39
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Thu, 02 Apr, 23:39
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Thu, 02 Apr, 23:45
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Fri, 03 Apr, 03:37
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Fri, 03 Apr, 19:49
Zameer Manji         Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Mon, 06 Apr, 17:46
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Fri, 03 Apr, 20:04
Aurora ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Fri, 03 Apr, 20:22
Zameer Manji         Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Mon, 06 Apr, 17:52
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Wed, 15 Apr, 19:05
Aurora ReviewBot           Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Wed, 15 Apr, 19:19
Bill Farner           Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Wed, 15 Apr, 19:58
Maxim Khutornenko             Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Thu, 16 Apr, 01:37
Maxim Khutornenko           Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Thu, 16 Apr, 01:39
Aurora ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Thu, 16 Apr, 01:53
Zameer Manji             Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Thu, 16 Apr, 23:08
Maxim Khutornenko               Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 01:11
Bill Farner             Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Fri, 17 Apr, 17:59
Maxim Khutornenko               Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 01:08
Bill Farner               Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 18:29
Maxim Khutornenko               Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 21:12
Maxim Khutornenko             Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 01:12
Aurora ReviewBot               Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 01:32
Bill Farner               Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 18:34
Maxim Khutornenko               Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 21:15
Aurora ReviewBot                 Re: Review Request 32597: Improving async preemptor efficiency. Tue, 21 Apr, 22:50
Bill Farner Review Request 32802: Add a benchmark for getRoleSummary. Fri, 03 Apr, 01:43
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32802: Add a benchmark for getRoleSummary. Fri, 03 Apr, 01:51
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32802: Add a benchmark for getRoleSummary. Fri, 03 Apr, 02:20
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32802: Add a benchmark for getRoleSummary. Fri, 03 Apr, 18:03
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 32802: Add a benchmark for getRoleSummary. Fri, 03 Apr, 18:26
Bill Farner Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 02:49
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 02:52
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 03:06
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 03:15
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 17:15
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 17:31
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 19:10
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 19:30
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 22:40
Joshua Cohen     Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Fri, 03 Apr, 21:13
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Thu, 09 Apr, 04:45
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 32806: Remove use of LocalServiceRegistry, simplify plumbing of HTTP address. Thu, 09 Apr, 04:45
Bill Farner Review Request 32825: Fix checkstyle violations in benchmarks. Fri, 03 Apr, 18:34
Joshua Cohen   Re: Review Request 32825: Fix checkstyle violations in benchmarks. Fri, 03 Apr, 18:35
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32825: Fix checkstyle violations in benchmarks. Fri, 03 Apr, 18:35
Review Request 32830: Fix header levels in monitoring.md
Stephan Erb   Review Request 32830: Fix header levels in monitoring.md Fri, 03 Apr, 19:09
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32830: Fix header levels in monitoring.md Fri, 03 Apr, 19:21
Stephan Erb     Re: Review Request 32830: Fix header levels in monitoring.md Fri, 03 Apr, 19:40
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 32830: Fix header levels in monitoring.md Fri, 03 Apr, 23:00
Stephan Erb       Re: Review Request 32830: Fix header levels in monitoring.md Sat, 04 Apr, 09:27
Stephan Erb   Re: Review Request 32830: Fix header levels in monitoring.md Sat, 04 Apr, 08:35
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32830: Fix header levels in monitoring.md Sat, 04 Apr, 08:51
Bill Farner Review Request 32840: Ignore maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs in the scheduler updater. Fri, 03 Apr, 23:23
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32840: Ignore maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs in the scheduler updater. Fri, 03 Apr, 23:34
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 32840: Ignore maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs in the scheduler updater. Fri, 03 Apr, 23:36
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32840: Ignore maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs in the scheduler updater. Fri, 03 Apr, 23:43
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32840: Ignore maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs in the scheduler updater. Fri, 03 Apr, 23:41
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32840: Ignore maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs in the scheduler updater. Fri, 03 Apr, 23:43
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32840: Ignore maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs in the scheduler updater. Mon, 06 Apr, 17:59
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32840: Ignore maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs in the scheduler updater. Mon, 06 Apr, 18:12
Review Request 32861: Increase executor resource epsilon to match the minimum required by Mesos
Stephan Erb   Review Request 32861: Increase executor resource epsilon to match the minimum required by Mesos Sat, 04 Apr, 09:25
Stephan Erb     Re: Review Request 32861: Increase executor resource epsilon to match the minimum required by Mesos Sat, 04 Apr, 09:33
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 32861: Increase executor resource epsilon to match the minimum required by Mesos Sat, 04 Apr, 09:41
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 32861: Increase executor resource epsilon to match the minimum required by Mesos Wed, 08 Apr, 00:41
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 32861: Increase executor resource epsilon to match the minimum required by Mesos Wed, 08 Apr, 00:41
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32861: Increase executor resource epsilon to match the minimum required by Mesos Thu, 09 Apr, 04:45
Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched
Stephan Erb   Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Mon, 06 Apr, 17:12
Stephan Erb     Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Mon, 06 Apr, 17:17
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Mon, 06 Apr, 17:25
Stephan Erb     Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Mon, 06 Apr, 17:36
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Mon, 06 Apr, 17:52
Stephan Erb     Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Mon, 06 Apr, 19:11
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Mon, 06 Apr, 19:33
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Fri, 10 Apr, 17:59
Stephan Erb     Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Sat, 11 Apr, 21:57
Stephan Erb   Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Sat, 11 Apr, 21:52
Stephan Erb     Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Sat, 11 Apr, 21:52
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Sat, 11 Apr, 22:13
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Mon, 13 Apr, 03:33
Stephan Erb       Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Tue, 14 Apr, 19:58
Zameer Manji         Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Tue, 14 Apr, 20:03
Joshua Cohen       Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Wed, 15 Apr, 16:48
Stephan Erb         Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Wed, 15 Apr, 18:40
Stephan Erb       Re: Review Request 32889: Only perform escalation wait when http teardown signal could be dispatched Wed, 15 Apr, 18:38
Bill Farner Review Request 32896: Remove scheduler warning when maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs is set. Mon, 06 Apr, 19:04
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 32896: Remove scheduler warning when maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs is set. Mon, 06 Apr, 19:10
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32896: Remove scheduler warning when maxWaitToInstanceRunningMs is set. Mon, 06 Apr, 19:22
Zameer Manji Review Request 32900: Remove url related methods out of AuroraCommandContext Mon, 06 Apr, 20:30
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32900: Remove url related methods out of AuroraCommandContext Mon, 06 Apr, 20:42
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32900: Remove url related methods out of AuroraCommandContext Tue, 07 Apr, 00:16
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 32900: Remove url related methods out of AuroraCommandContext Tue, 07 Apr, 19:48
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 32900: Remove url related methods out of AuroraCommandContext Tue, 07 Apr, 19:44
Zameer Manji Review Request 32905: Remove factory.py Mon, 06 Apr, 22:58
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32905: Remove factory.py Mon, 06 Apr, 23:09
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 32905: Remove factory.py Tue, 07 Apr, 00:05
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32905: Remove factory.py Tue, 07 Apr, 00:24
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 32905: Remove factory.py Thu, 09 Apr, 02:41
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 32905: Remove factory.py Thu, 09 Apr, 22:58
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 32905: Remove factory.py Thu, 09 Apr, 22:57
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 32905: Remove factory.py Thu, 09 Apr, 23:13
Bill Farner Review Request 32909: Add a test utility to check that all fields are set on a storage entity. Mon, 06 Apr, 23:19
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32909: Add a test utility to check that all fields are set on a storage entity. Mon, 06 Apr, 23:33
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32909: Add a test utility to check that all fields are set on a storage entity. Tue, 07 Apr, 00:24
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Mon, 06 Apr, 23:51
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 07 Apr, 00:13
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Thu, 09 Apr, 03:06
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 01:08
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 01:09
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 01:22
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 17:07
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 18:17
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 18:32
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 19:52
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 19:59
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 32907: Generalizing preemption reservation pool. Tue, 14 Apr, 20:00
Zameer Manji Review Request 32912: Bump pants version to 0.0.32. Tue, 07 Apr, 00:35
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32912: Bump pants version to 0.0.32. Tue, 07 Apr, 00:37
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 32912: Bump pants version to 0.0.32. Tue, 07 Apr, 00:57
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32912: Bump pants version to 0.0.32. Tue, 07 Apr, 00:51
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 32912: Bump pants version to 0.0.32. Tue, 07 Apr, 00:56
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 32912: Bump pants version to 0.0.32. Wed, 08 Apr, 18:34
Brian Brazil Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 08 Apr, 14:09
Brian Brazil   Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 08 Apr, 14:34
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 08 Apr, 14:34
Jay Buffington     Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 08 Apr, 15:45
Brian Brazil     Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 08 Apr, 15:50
Brian Brazil       Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 08 Apr, 15:51
Aurora ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 08 Apr, 16:02
Stephan Erb         Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 08 Apr, 18:51
Brian Brazil           Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Fri, 10 Apr, 11:33
Brian Brazil         Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Fri, 10 Apr, 11:34
Brian Brazil         Re: Review Request 32973: Allow config of the /quitquitquit and /abortabortabort endpoints. Wed, 22 Apr, 11:56
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Wed, 08 Apr, 21:45
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Wed, 08 Apr, 22:02
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Thu, 09 Apr, 02:25
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Thu, 09 Apr, 02:29
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Thu, 09 Apr, 18:43
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Thu, 09 Apr, 18:43
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Thu, 09 Apr, 19:01
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Thu, 09 Apr, 19:15
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Thu, 09 Apr, 19:20
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 32990: Improving JobUpdateDetails fetch performance. Thu, 09 Apr, 19:58
Zameer Manji Review Request 32993: Revert "Bump pants version to 0.0.32." Wed, 08 Apr, 23:02
Joshua Cohen   Re: Review Request 32993: Revert "Bump pants version to 0.0.32." Wed, 08 Apr, 23:03
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 32993: Revert "Bump pants version to 0.0.32." Thu, 09 Apr, 02:22
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 32993: Revert "Bump pants version to 0.0.32." Thu, 09 Apr, 18:46
Michael Schenck Review Request 33019: Added new (optional) paramter to ProcessBase for a statsd end-point, and submits a counter (increment) per "process.state" when statsd end-point provided Thu, 09 Apr, 16:38
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33019: Added new (optional) paramter to ProcessBase for a statsd end-point, and submits a counter (increment) per "process.state" when statsd end-point provided Thu, 09 Apr, 16:46
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33019: Added new (optional) paramter to ProcessBase for a statsd end-point, and submits a counter (increment) per "process.state" when statsd end-point provided Fri, 10 Apr, 01:03
Bill Farner Review Request 33026: Revert "Make health check configurable" Thu, 09 Apr, 18:03
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 33026: Revert "Make health check configurable" Thu, 09 Apr, 18:08
Joshua Cohen   Re: Review Request 33026: Revert "Make health check configurable" Thu, 09 Apr, 18:14
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33026: Revert "Make health check configurable" Thu, 09 Apr, 18:15
Kevin Sweeney Review Request 33029: Use installDist instead of installApp. Thu, 09 Apr, 19:02
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 33029: Use installDist instead of installApp. Thu, 09 Apr, 19:03
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33029: Use installDist instead of installApp. Thu, 09 Apr, 19:18
Re: Review Request 32161: Create a packer definition to build a base vagrant box.
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 32161: Create a packer definition to build a base vagrant box. Thu, 09 Apr, 21:25
Kevin Sweeney Review Request 33048: wip Fri, 10 Apr, 00:34
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 00:49
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 00:52
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 02:09
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 17:40
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 17:39
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 17:46
Joshua Cohen       Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 17:50
Kevin Sweeney         Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 18:05
Joshua Cohen       Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 18:28
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 22:03
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 33048: Add an end-to-end test for HTTP basic auth. Fri, 10 Apr, 22:29
Bill Farner Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Sat, 11 Apr, 17:16
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Sat, 11 Apr, 17:34
Brian Wickman   Re: Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Mon, 13 Apr, 15:30
Brian Wickman   Re: Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Mon, 13 Apr, 15:32
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Mon, 13 Apr, 19:40
Joshua Cohen   Re: Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Mon, 13 Apr, 18:21
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Mon, 13 Apr, 19:44
Joe Smith     Re: Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Mon, 13 Apr, 19:55
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 33103: Skip known flaky tests. Mon, 13 Apr, 20:15
Bill Farner Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Sat, 11 Apr, 18:22
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Sat, 11 Apr, 18:26
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Mon, 13 Apr, 22:50
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Mon, 13 Apr, 23:06
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Tue, 14 Apr, 00:06
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Tue, 14 Apr, 21:10
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Tue, 14 Apr, 21:14
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Tue, 14 Apr, 21:29
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 33105: Return Iterable from TaskStore.fetchTasks to allow for streaming. Tue, 14 Apr, 21:42
Bill Farner Review Request 33106: Simplify AttributeAggregate. Sun, 12 Apr, 02:11
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33106: Simplify AttributeAggregate. Sun, 12 Apr, 02:32
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 33106: Simplify AttributeAggregate. Mon, 13 Apr, 22:59
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33106: Simplify AttributeAggregate. Mon, 13 Apr, 23:57
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33106: Simplify AttributeAggregate. Tue, 14 Apr, 04:00
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 33106: Simplify AttributeAggregate. Tue, 14 Apr, 04:16
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 33106: Simplify AttributeAggregate. Tue, 14 Apr, 16:49
Review Request 33184: Implement missing != operator for AuroraJobKey
Stephan Erb   Review Request 33184: Implement missing != operator for AuroraJobKey Tue, 14 Apr, 18:51
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33184: Implement missing != operator for AuroraJobKey Tue, 14 Apr, 18:53
Stephan Erb       Re: Review Request 33184: Implement missing != operator for AuroraJobKey Tue, 14 Apr, 19:19
Stephan Erb     Re: Review Request 33184: Implement missing != operator for AuroraJobKey Tue, 14 Apr, 18:54
Stephan Erb       Re: Review Request 33184: Implement missing != operator for AuroraJobKey Tue, 14 Apr, 19:18
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33184: Implement missing != operator for AuroraJobKey Tue, 14 Apr, 19:28
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 33191: Removing taskId from ResourceRequest. Tue, 14 Apr, 21:08
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33191: Removing taskId from ResourceRequest. Tue, 14 Apr, 21:22
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33191: Removing taskId from ResourceRequest. Tue, 14 Apr, 21:28
Bill Farner Review Request 33200: Require non-default primitive values in StorageEntityUtil, extract a task factory utility. Wed, 15 Apr, 00:04
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33200: Require non-default primitive values in StorageEntityUtil, extract a task factory utility. Wed, 15 Apr, 00:22
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33200: Require non-default primitive values in StorageEntityUtil, extract a task factory utility. Thu, 16 Apr, 18:58
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 33200: Require non-default primitive values in StorageEntityUtil, extract a task factory utility. Thu, 16 Apr, 21:40
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33200: Require non-default primitive values in StorageEntityUtil, extract a task factory utility. Thu, 16 Apr, 21:56
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 33200: Require non-default primitive values in StorageEntityUtil, extract a task factory utility. Tue, 21 Apr, 01:25
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 33202: Fixing benchmarks. Wed, 15 Apr, 00:32
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33202: Fixing benchmarks. Wed, 15 Apr, 00:52
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 33202: Fixing benchmarks. Wed, 15 Apr, 03:07
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 33202: Fixing benchmarks. Wed, 15 Apr, 03:27
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33202: Fixing benchmarks. Wed, 15 Apr, 04:09
Ben Mahler Review Request 33233: Updated mesos library to 0.22.0. Wed, 15 Apr, 18:58
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33233: Updated mesos library to 0.22.0. Wed, 15 Apr, 19:32
Ben Mahler   Re: Review Request 33233: Updated mesos library to 0.22.0. Wed, 15 Apr, 22:42
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33233: Updated mesos library to 0.22.0. Thu, 16 Apr, 21:51
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 33233: Updated mesos library to 0.22.0. Mon, 20 Apr, 16:37
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 33235: Fixing e2e kerberos tests. Wed, 15 Apr, 20:01
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33235: Fixing e2e kerberos tests. Wed, 15 Apr, 20:13
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 33235: Fixing e2e kerberos tests. Wed, 15 Apr, 21:15
Ben Mahler Review Request 33244: Fixed the end-to-end tests. Wed, 15 Apr, 22:42
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33244: Fixed the end-to-end tests. Wed, 15 Apr, 22:49
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 33244: Fixed the end-to-end tests. Thu, 16 Apr, 01:46
Ben Mahler     Re: Review Request 33244: Fixed the end-to-end tests. Thu, 16 Apr, 19:01
Ben Mahler Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Wed, 15 Apr, 22:47
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Wed, 15 Apr, 22:49
Ben Mahler     Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Wed, 15 Apr, 22:58
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Wed, 15 Apr, 23:06
Ben Mahler     Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 22:43
Ben Mahler   Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 22:44
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 23:05
Ben Mahler       Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 23:14
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 23:10
Ben Mahler     Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 23:14
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 23:32
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 23:47
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 33243: Use explicit status update acknowledgements. Mon, 27 Apr, 23:48
Bill Farner Review Request 33273: Add a specific storage routine for bulk loading data. Thu, 16 Apr, 21:50
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 33273: Add a specific storage routine for bulk loading data. Thu, 16 Apr, 22:03
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 33273: Add a specific storage routine for bulk loading data. Fri, 17 Apr, 01:37
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 33273: Add a specific storage routine for bulk loading data. Tue, 21 Apr, 20:47
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Feb 20204
Jan 202018
Dec 201921
Nov 201926
Oct 201911
Sep 201958
Aug 201928
Jul 20195
Jun 201923
May 20191
Mar 20194
Feb 20196
Jan 20191
Dec 20181
Nov 201811
Oct 201871
Sep 201871
Aug 201823
Jul 201871
Jun 201893
May 2018146
Apr 201894
Mar 2018136
Feb 2018101
Jan 2018127
Dec 2017220
Nov 2017226
Oct 2017607
Sep 2017189
Aug 201788
Jul 201762
Jun 2017256
May 2017169
Apr 2017174
Mar 2017211
Feb 2017252
Jan 2017277
Dec 2016347
Nov 2016286
Oct 2016417
Sep 2016613
Aug 2016344
Jul 2016227
Jun 2016224
May 2016299
Apr 2016548
Mar 2016655
Feb 2016337
Jan 2016735
Dec 2015580
Nov 2015304
Oct 2015229
Sep 2015385
Aug 2015488
Jul 2015418
Jun 2015324
May 2015403
Apr 2015470
Mar 2015676
Feb 2015873
Jan 2015780
Dec 2014439
Nov 2014766
Oct 20141033
Sep 2014705
Aug 2014357
Jul 2014400
Jun 2014431
May 2014661
Apr 2014475
Mar 2014498
Feb 2014556
Jan 2014450