aurora-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Maxim Khutornenko" <ma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 33202: Fixing benchmarks.
Date Wed, 15 Apr 2015 03:27:36 GMT


> On April 15, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/SchedulingBenchmarks.java, line 135
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33202/diff/1/?file=929440#file929440line135>
> >
> >     IMHO the empty string is a wart, and emphasizes my point about letting the consumer
decide if they want stats.  I won't harp on it, but i think this has made the code less reusable.

This is hardly a good example though as we always want stats in production. I will be happy
to reconsider should we have a real counter case. So far, every time we deal with caches we
always want more visibility.


- Maxim


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33202/#review80148
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 15, 2015, 12:32 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33202/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 15, 2015, 12:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Benchmark module configuration got broken by recent refactoring.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/SchedulingBenchmarks.java 011350540d4f5091ff5f8a3c646f40f3f63357fd

> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33202/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew jmh
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message