aurora-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin Sweeney" <kevi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 31042: Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS
Date Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:38:47 GMT


> On Feb. 18, 2015, 11:42 a.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
> > Hi Craig, thanks for the contribution. I'm wondering if this document might be better
suited as a gist or blog post given that it's dated (0.7.1) and we don't have automated test
coverage to ensure it doesn't diverge from the rest of the source tree. Alternatively if you'd
like to provide a spec file and test coverage (e.g. docker run within our CI build) I think
this would be much more palatable to commit. Also, while I personally love Digital Ocean I'm
not sure what the rules on endorsing a specific vendor in official project documentation are.
> 
> Craig Wickesser wrote:
>     I could post it as a blog post, where would a link to a blog post best go in the
docs?
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     I share Kevin's concern over bit rot here, simply because we have nothing to exercise
these.  However, i think Craig points out a big gap in figuring out _what_ components are
needed for a healthy Aurora cluster.  More specifically, `README.md` has a link titled 'Deploying
Aurora' that is actually a guide for deploying the scheduler, and there is no equivalent for
other components.  (I've observed three people in IRC this week alone falling into this trap.)
>     
>     Craig - how would you feel about pulling relevant content from this diff into deploying-aurora-scheduler.md
[1] (renaming to deploying-aurora.md)?
>     Kevin - does that sound reasonable?
>     
>     
>     [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-aurora/blob/master/docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md
> 
> Craig Wickesser wrote:
>     Bill, I think updating the existing "deploying" doc makes sense. If Kevin agrees,
I'll take that route.

+1


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/#review72994
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 16, 2015, 11:21 a.m., Craig Wickesser wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 16, 2015, 11:21 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added document describing how to build Aurora for CentOS
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/build-for-centos.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31042/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Craig Wickesser
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message